Federal Court Practice

Federal court Social Security disability appeals.

Focused representation challenging qualifying Social Security disability decisions through judicial review in United States District Court.

Close review of a printed administrative record

Federal disability litigation is written work. Its quality is determined long before a brief is filed — in how the record is read.

  1. 01

    How a matter reaches federal court

    A disability claim moves through the Social Security Administration's administrative process. When that process concludes with an unfavorable final decision, a claimant may generally seek review of that decision in United States District Court within the time permitted by law.

  2. 02

    What judicial review means

    A federal court does not rehear the claim or take new evidence. It examines the decision that was made — whether the correct legal standards were applied, and whether the conclusions are supported by the record that was before the agency.

  3. 03

    Why federal cases differ

    The record is closed and the audience changes. Persuasion happens in writing, within federal procedural rules, and on grounds a court is empowered to act upon. Arguments that carry weight administratively may have no purchase on review.

  4. 04

    Administrative record analysis

    The record is read in full: medical evidence, vocational testimony, the hearing transcript, and the written decision. The object is to locate where the reasoning breaks down and to establish that breakdown with citations rather than characterization.

  5. 05

    Legal briefing

    Briefs are written to be useful to the court — issues stated plainly, standards identified accurately, and the record cited with precision. Fewer, stronger issues are preferred to comprehensive but undifferentiated argument.

  6. 06

    Identifying reversible error

    Not every flaw supports relief. The work is distinguishing between imperfection and error of the kind that warrants remand or reversal under the applicable standards.

For attorneys

Working with referring counsel.

The firm welcomes conversations with attorneys regarding federal Social Security matters, including questions of timing, procedure, and whether a particular decision presents issues suited to judicial review.

Arrangements with referring counsel are handled in accordance with the applicable rules of professional conduct.

This page describes the general nature of federal court review of Social Security disability decisions. It is not legal advice, and it does not address the deadlines or requirements that may apply to any particular matter. Whether review is available in a given case depends on facts specific to that case.